<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google visitor tracking and behavior factoring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.1stsearchenginerankings.com/google-visitor-tracking-and-behavior-factoring.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.1stsearchenginerankings.com/google-visitor-tracking-and-behavior-factoring.html</link>
	<description>Tips and Advice for Small Business Owners</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:37:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: visio</title>
		<link>http://www.1stsearchenginerankings.com/google-visitor-tracking-and-behavior-factoring.html/comment-page-1#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>visio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stsearchenginerankings.com/2007/03/28/google-visitor-tracking-and-behavior-factoring/#comment-831</guid>
		<description>Hmm I researched this but didn&#039;t see his post before now. Interesting view on it but I must disagree.  He thinks that it will be bad, I highly disagree with that.  It will be a great benefit to those of us with quality sites.  In such a scenario webmasters will strive to provide what the end-user wants, which in reality is what Google will want.  So if you can please the visitor you have pleased Google.  It will make a better Google and hence a better internet.
I can see where some are worried that google can&#039;t accurately decide this and will screw it. I don&#039;t believe that.  I believe they are working on it right now but won&#039;t implement it fully until they know how it will work. Google is very good at this.

Thanks for the link webgeek!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm I researched this but didn&#8217;t see his post before now. Interesting view on it but I must disagree.  He thinks that it will be bad, I highly disagree with that.  It will be a great benefit to those of us with quality sites.  In such a scenario webmasters will strive to provide what the end-user wants, which in reality is what Google will want.  So if you can please the visitor you have pleased Google.  It will make a better Google and hence a better internet.<br />
I can see where some are worried that google can&#8217;t accurately decide this and will screw it. I don&#8217;t believe that.  I believe they are working on it right now but won&#8217;t implement it fully until they know how it will work. Google is very good at this.</p>
<p>Thanks for the link webgeek!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.1stsearchenginerankings.com/google-visitor-tracking-and-behavior-factoring.html/comment-page-1#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>WebGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stsearchenginerankings.com/2007/03/28/google-visitor-tracking-and-behavior-factoring/#comment-803</guid>
		<description>GReat POST! I&#039;ve been thinking along these lines for a while now. ED AT TN38 proposed something similar in his post at: http://blog.tn38.net/archives/2006/11/the_bounce_effe.html I believe this will definitely be taking place if it isn&#039;t already. IT would make perfect sense as to why Google makes a tool like Google analytics free - so they can gather data. I think it would be a great step in factoring quality of sites. of course, any system can be gamed, but this would be much more difficult than typical black hat. I&#039;d definitely be interested in hearing further thoughts on this topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GReat POST! I&#8217;ve been thinking along these lines for a while now. ED AT TN38 proposed something similar in his post at: <a href="http://blog.tn38.net/archives/2006/11/the_bounce_effe.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.tn38.net/archives/2006/11/the_bounce_effe.html</a> I believe this will definitely be taking place if it isn&#8217;t already. IT would make perfect sense as to why Google makes a tool like Google analytics free &#8211; so they can gather data. I think it would be a great step in factoring quality of sites. of course, any system can be gamed, but this would be much more difficult than typical black hat. I&#8217;d definitely be interested in hearing further thoughts on this topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digitalnomad</title>
		<link>http://www.1stsearchenginerankings.com/google-visitor-tracking-and-behavior-factoring.html/comment-page-1#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>digitalnomad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stsearchenginerankings.com/2007/03/28/google-visitor-tracking-and-behavior-factoring/#comment-715</guid>
		<description>Got my attention. Keep us posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got my attention. Keep us posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

